[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM +0000, Alan wrote:
> > So where is the difference between SATA-I and SATA-II ?
> All physical side if they are on the same controller when you do the
> tests. Mostly latency,

SATA-II is a highly confusing marketing term. It is /not/ a technical

In some cases there are NO differences between SATA-I and SATA-II. You
can find 1.5Gbps non-NCQ-supporting devices claiming SATA-II.

Similarly, there is no "SATA version" word in the IDENTIFY DEVICE page,
like there are "ATA version" words.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-13 18:15    [W:0.090 / U:1.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site