Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:12:33 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: SATA-performance: Linux vs. FreeBSD |
| |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:25:27AM +0000, Alan wrote: > > So where is the difference between SATA-I and SATA-II ? > > All physical side if they are on the same controller when you do the > tests. Mostly latency,
SATA-II is a highly confusing marketing term. It is /not/ a technical term.
In some cases there are NO differences between SATA-I and SATA-II. You can find 1.5Gbps non-NCQ-supporting devices claiming SATA-II.
Similarly, there is no "SATA version" word in the IDENTIFY DEVICE page, like there are "ATA version" words.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |