[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)" to "array_for_each(index, array)"
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:20 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>> #define array_for_each(element, array) \
>> for (int __idx = 0; __idx < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); \
>> __idx++, (element) = &(array[__idx]))
> This requires all interior loop code be changed.

Ben is right though. Making this thing confusing to use is going
to be worse than sticking with the very simple and unconfusing

If you really wanted to introduce your loop, then please call it
array_for_each_idx, or something to distinguish it.

SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-13 05:21    [W:0.032 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site