lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] linux/io.h: forward declare struct pci_dev
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:34:31 +0000 Al Viro wrote:
> My current version:
>
> >From 97f115834b5ebef4f04e0f18aaa10f78f43733a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:41:09 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] sort the devres mess out
>
> Split the implementation-agnostic stuff in separate files.
> Make sure that targets using non-default request_irq() pull kernel/irq/devres.o
> Mark targets that have no ioport_map() and friends, protect the ioport-related
> Parts of lib/devres.o with corresponding ifdef (BTW, we need it in driver
> dependencies in quite a few of cases, so that symbol was needed anyway).
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 1523046..7215152 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ config MMU
> bool
> default y
>
> +config NO_IOPORT
> + bool
> + default n

Uh, I think that we would rather see a positive-sense symbol instead
of a negative one. Any reason that this one prefers to be negative?

Thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-11 08:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans