Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:08:07 -0800 | From | "Jared Hulbert" <> | Subject | Re: solid state drive access and context switching |
| |
On Dec 4, 2007 3:24 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > Right. The trend is to hide the nastiness of NAND technology changes > > behind controllers. In general I think this is a good thing. > > You miss the point - any controller you hide it behind almost inevitably > adds enough latency you don't want to use it synchronously.
I think I get it. We keep saying that it's the latency is too high. I agree that most technologies out there have latencies that are too high. Again I ask the question, what latencies do we have to hit before the sync options become worth it?
| |