lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Suspend code ordering (again)
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 of December 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> the ACPI specification between versions 1.0x and 2.0. Namely, while ACPI
>>> 2.0 and later wants us to put devices into low power states before calling
>>> _PTS, ACPI 1.0x wants us to do that after calling _PTS. Since we're following
>>> the 2.0 and later specifications right now, we're not doing the right thing for
>>> the (strictly) ACPI 1.0x-compliant systems.
>>>
>>> We ought to be able to fix things on the high level, by calling _PTS earlier on
>>> systems that claim to be ACPI 1.0x-compliant. That will require us to modify
>>> the generic susped code quite a bit and will need to be tested for some time.
>>>
>> That's insane. Are you really saying that ACPI wants totally different
>> orderings for different versions of the spec?
>>
>
> Yes, I am.
>
>
>> And does Windows really do that?
>>
>
> I don't know.
>
Windows was compliant only with 1.x spec until Vista.
With Vista claims are 3.x compliance.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-26 16:27    [W:0.113 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site