[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] kthread: run kthreadd with max priority SCHED_FIFO
    On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 02:11 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > Should there be a watchdog which checks for a process which has run
    > realtime for a certain period and which then takes some action? Such as
    > descheduling it for a while, generating warnings, demoting its policy,
    > killing it etc?

    Using the analogy of the OOM killer being called, this wouldn't be a bad
    idea IMO - especially if it were configurable, and off by default. This
    couldn't be done in a kernel thread (unless some new priority level were
    created for it), but I think the details can be worked out later.

    Michal - what do you think is the best upstream solution?


     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-22 11:21    [W:0.021 / U:8.640 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site