lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)
    Hi,

    Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
    > > In an extreme case (boot with slub_min_order=9 to get huge page sized
    > > slabs) SLUB can win against SLAB:
    > >
    > > N=10 Time: 0.338 Minimally faster
    > > N=20 Time: 0.560 10% faster
    > > N=50 Time: 1.353 15% faster

    On Dec 21, 2007 2:09 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
    > what's up with this regression? There's been absolutely no activity
    > about it in the last 8 days: upstream still regresses, -mm still
    > regresses and there are no patches posted for testing.

    Christoph, did you see Steven's oprofile results for the hackbench
    runs (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/8/198)? Any ideas why we're hitting
    add_partial like crazy?

    Pekka


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-21 18:47    [W:4.050 / U:0.852 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site