Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:08:58 -0800 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: another attempt at x86 pagetable unification |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > >>> Here's another round of the pagetable unification patches. I've >>> done a few dozen rounds of randconfig builds on both 32- and 64-bit, >>> so I hope that will prevent compile problems in your test >>> environment. >>> >>> I've also boot-tested 64-bit and 32-bit PAE/non-PAE configs (both >>> paravirt and non-paravirt). >>> >> i've done a dozen random tests too and it's looking good so far. Nice >> work! >> > > found a couple of bugs. > > firstly, 64-bit wasnt so lucky, you broke iounmap()/change_page_attr() > :-) >
Crap. Worked for me. I'll look into it.
> The crash is here: > > [ 0.000000] PCI: Calling quirk ffffffff804625d0 for 0000:00:02.0 > [ 0.000000] PCI: Calling quirk ffffffff80565b10 for 0000:00:02.0 > [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.000000] kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr_64.c:176! > [ 0.000000] invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP > [ 0.000000] CPU 1 > [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: > [ 0.000000] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc5 #5 > [ 0.000000] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802229b9>] [<ffffffff802229b9>] __change_page_attr+0x189/0x2e0 > [ 0.000000] RSP: 0018:ffff81003f9c3d30 EFLAGS: 00010282 > [ 0.000000] RAX: 0000000000000400 RBX: 00000000000da103 RCX: ffffe20000000370 > [ 0.000000] RDX: 000000000000006e RSI: 00003ffffffff000 RDI: ffff81000000a000 > [ 0.000000] RBP: ffff81003f9c3d90 R08: 80000000da0001e3 R09: 0000000000000001 > [ 0.000000] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: ffff81000000a680 > [ 0.000000] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 8000000000000163 R15: ffff8100da103000 > [ 0.000000] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff81003f8014b0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > [ 0.000000] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b > [ 0.000000] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > [ 0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > [ 0.000000] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > [ 0.000000] Process swapper (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff81003f9c2000, task ffff81003f9c0000) > [ 0.000000] Stack: ffff8100da102000 8000000000000163 8000000000000163 0000000000000000 > [ 0.000000] ffffffff809320e0 ffff8100da102000 ffff81003f9c3d70 00000000000da103 > [ 0.000000] ffff8100da103000 0000000000000001 8000000000000163 0000000000000000 > [ 0.000000] Call Trace: > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80222bb6>] change_page_attr_addr+0xa6/0x150 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8022243b>] ioremap_change_attr+0x5b/0x70 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8022265f>] iounmap+0xbf/0xe0 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80565e23>] quirk_usb_early_handoff+0x313/0x410 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8044a109>] kobject_put+0x19/0x20 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff804a45d5>] put_device+0x15/0x20 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff804611bd>] pci_fixup_device+0x8d/0xe0 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8045f53d>] pci_init+0x1d/0x40 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a04794>] kernel_init+0x164/0x350 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8025cd9f>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x160 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff806fc824>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x3a > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8025cd9f>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x160 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8020cba8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8020c2bf>] restore_args+0x0/0x30 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff80a04630>] kernel_init+0x0/0x350 > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8020cb9e>] child_rip+0x0/0x12 > [ 0.000000] > [ 0.000000] > [ 0.000000] Code: 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 48 b8 7f 0f > [ 0.000000] RIP [<ffffffff802229b9>] __change_page_attr+0x189/0x2e0 > [ 0.000000] RSP <ffff81003f9c3d30> > [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > > secondly, as i tried to bisect it, it would build and boot at this > patch: > > Subject: x86: clean up asm-x86/page*.h > > but wouldnt build at this patch: > > Subject: x86: unify pgtable*.h > > nor at this patch: > > Subject: x86: fix up formatting in pgtable*.h > > it finally built at: > > Subject: x86: use a uniform structure for pte_t > > but crashed. So the bug is in one of those 3 patches. Please make them > bisect-friendly. >
Hm, I tried to.
> full bootlog and config attached. (The crash happens reliably here - if > you cannot reproduce it then i can try any fix from you. I've removed > the 5 patches of yours for now from x86.git.) >
OK. Will beat on this some more. Unfortunately I can only test 64-bit stuff under kvm, and I'm a little bit skeptical of how solid it is, since i get sporadic random oopses even with base x86.git. But a nice simple repeatable BUG_ON should be easy to fix regardless.
J
| |