Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:42:15 +0100 | From | Takashi Iwai <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 |
| |
At Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:49:51 +0100, I wrote: > > [Sorry for the late response as I've been on vacation] > > At Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500, > Theodore Tso wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML > > > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing > > > > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in > > > > your regression list, > > > > > > Done, thanks. > > > > Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression > > since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a > > big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to > > polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference > > (although I guess it's less efficient). > > > > Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the > > patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25! > > You mean 2.6.24 ? ;-) > > Yes, if it solves the problem, not only improves the latency, it's > definitely nice to have now. I was just too conservative to mark it > for 2.6.24 merge although it looks safe. > > Jaroslav, could you prepare this for the push? It corresponds to > alsa-kernel HG changeset 5557.
Jaroslav, what about this now?
Takashi
| |