[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:42:57PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>> And even more funny, with gcc 4.2 and CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y your
>> patch doesn't seem to make any space difference - are you using an older
>> compiler or even worse CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n for being able to see
>> any space difference?
>> In both cases your code uglification would be even more pointless...
> I believe that CONFIG_SMP is uglification for you Adrian, but still I am
> glad linux have it.
> If your CONFIG_SYSCTL=n is really that important for you, why dont you
> define a new qualifier that can indeed mark some variables as :
> const if CONFIG_SYSCTL=n
> read_mostly if CONFIG_SYCTL=y
> This way you can keep compiler optimizations for your CONFIG_SYCTL=n, while
> many people like me can still continue to optimize their kernel.
> Seeing so many sysctl already read_mostly in kernel, I wonder why you NACK
> my patch, while it's easy to share your concerns with other people and find
> a solution.

You omitted an answer to my main important point...

Let me ask it in a more simple way:

Do you see any space difference at all with gcc 4.2 and



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-16 19:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean