lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: sockets affected by IPsec always block (2.6.23)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:12:32 +1100
>
>> [INET]: Export non-blocking flags to proto connect call
>>
>> Previously we made connect(2) block on IPsec SA resolution. This is
>> good in general but not desirable for non-blocking sockets.
>>
>> To fix this properly we'd need to implement the larval IPsec dst stuff
>> that we talked about. For now let's just revert to the old behaviour
>> on non-blocking sockets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
>
> We made an explicit decision not to do things this way.
>
> Non-blocking has a meaning dependant upon the xfrm_larval_drop sysctl
> setting, and this is across the board. If xfrm_larval_drop is zero,
> non-blocking semantics do not extend to IPSEC route resolution,
> otherwise it does.
>
> If he sets this sysctl to "1" as I detailed in my reply, he'll
> get the behavior he wants.
>
I think you for the hint, but I would hardly call this sentence
"detailed" in terms of being a cookbook solution to the problem.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-16 23:33    [W:0.067 / U:3.396 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site