* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:

> Further unification work.  There is a possible behavior change on 
> X86_32 here.
> 
> is_IF_modifier(p->opcode)
> 
> to
> 
> is_IF_modifier(p->ainsn.insn)
> 
> Which should be equivalent, but is not purely cosmetic as the rest of 
> the unification so far.

hm, could you split this into two, the pure-equivalence and the 
possibly-modifying patch? (that way any potential breakage becomes 
bisectable) Same end result, just two commits instead of one.

also, did you manage to run/test kprobes (on 32-bit or 64-bit x86), and 
it worked fine?

	Ingo