lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
> >> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
> >> (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
> >> I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to
> >> have my main system down long enough for a test. Right now I'm kinda
> >> up against a deadline, but didn't want to leave it unreported. Should
> >> be easy for someone else to confirm or deny whether current tip has
> >> the problem.
> >
> > FYI, I have created a bugzilla entry for this issue at:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9568
>
> Hmm what do you mean by empty ? it does not capturing anything on that interface ?

Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
when I did a make oldconfig, I suppose. (Or because I'm on an x86-64
kernel?) Regardless, -rc5 is currently building, and I'll try it in
the morning.

> I do run -rc5-git with wireshark-0.99.6 and tshark -i eth0 or lo works here.

Excellent. Thank you for checking!

Rafael: I'll update the bugzilla as warranted after testing.

Ray


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-15 08:13    [W:0.173 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site