lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [rfc] lockless get_user_pages for dio (and more)
Date
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 16:11, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 08:30, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > > Nick,
> > > I've played with the fast_gup patch a bit. I was able to find a
> > > problem in follow_hugetlb_page() that Adam Litke fixed. I'm haven't
> > > been brave enough to implement it on any other architectures, but I did
> > > add a default that takes mmap_sem and calls the normal
> > > get_user_pages() if the architecture doesn't define fast_gup(). I put
> > > it in linux/mm.h, for lack of a better place, but it's a little kludgy
> > > since I didn't want mm.h to have to include sched.h. This patch is
> > > against 2.6.24-rc4. It's not ready for inclusion yet, of course.
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Thanks so much. This makes it much more a complete patch (although
> > still missing the "normal page" detection).
> >
> > I think I missed -- or forgot -- what was the follow_hugetlb_page
> > problem?
>
> Badari found a problem running some tests and handed it off to me to
> look at. I didn't share it publicly. Anyway, we were finding that
> fastgup was taking the slow path almost all the time with huge pages.
> The problem was that follow_hugetlb_page was failing to fault on a
> non-writable page when it needed a writable one. So we'd keep seeing a
> non-writable page over and over. This is fixed in 2.6.24-rc5.

Ah yes, I just saw that fix in the changelog. So not a problem with my
patch as such, but good to get that fixed.


> > Anyway, I am hoping that someone will one day and test if this and
> > find it helps their workload, but on the other hand, if it doesn't
> > help anyone then we don't have to worry about adding it to the
> > kernel ;) I don't have any real setups that hammers DIO with threads.
> > I'm guessing DB2 and/or Oracle does?
>
> I'll try to get someone to run a DB2 benchmark and see what it looks
> like.

That would be great if you could.

Thanks,
Nick


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-12 06:43    [W:0.058 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site