Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:00:54 -0500 | From | "David P. Reed" <> | Subject | Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops |
| |
Which port do you want me to test? Also, I can run the timing test on my machine if you share the source code so I can build it.
Rene Herman wrote: > On 11-12-07 17:30, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Anyways it looks like the discussion here is going in a >> a loop. I had hoped David would post his test results with >> another port so that we know for sure that the bus aborts (and not >> port 80) is the problem on his box. But it looks like >> he doesn't want to do this. Still removing the bus aborts >> is probably the correct way to go forward. > > Yes, I do also still want to know that. David (Reed)? > >> Only needs a patch now. If nobody beats me to it i'll >> add one later to my tree. > > Pavel Machek already posted one. His udelay(8) wants to be less -- 1 > or "to be safe" perhaps 2. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/9/131 > > Rene. >
| |