lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1
 >    - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and
> moved over to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot
> to set CONFIG_E1000E.


Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on?
As far as I can see that's not true, which will screwing everybody
for no good reason (plus breaking all the automated testing, etc etc)?
Much though I love random refactoring, it is fairly painful to just
keep changing the names of things.


I can't see this compile failure posted anywhere:
http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126049/build/debug/stderr

arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/sigreturn.S:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid
for `pop'

arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/syscall.S:25: Error: suffix or operands invalid for
`pop'
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/syscall.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86/vdso] Error 2


Nor this one:
http://test.kernel.org/results/IBM/126096/build/debug/stderr

drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary
exclamation mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-11 17:47    [W:0.411 / U:11.036 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site