[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4

* Jie Chen <> wrote:

> Hi, Ingo:
> I guess it is a good news. I did patch kernel using your cfs
> patch. The results of pthread_sync is the same as the non-patched
> 2.6.21 kernel. This means the performance of is not related to the
> scheduler. As for overhead of the gettimeofday, there is no difference
> between 2.6.21 and 2.6.24-rc4. The reference time is around 10.5 us
> for both kernel.

could you please paste again the relevant portion of the output you get
on a "good" .21 kernel versus the output you get on a "bad" .24 kernel?

> So what is changed between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22? Any hints :-). Thank you
> very much for all your help.

we'll figure it out i'm sure :)


 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-11 16:57    [W:0.094 / U:6.832 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site