Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] frv: Remove bogus NO_IRQ = -1 define | Date | Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:28:22 +0000 |
| |
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete > and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as > IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be > zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time. > > arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes > needing doing I guess
FRV doesn't use IRQ 0, so using 0 instead is fine.
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |