Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:19:35 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c |
| |
Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I have read the hep text, but are the advantages of HZ == 300 really > visible or was this more theoretical? > > In the latter case, we might remove the HZ == 300 choice instead. >
Well, we have, for various architectures:
HZ == 48, 100, 128, 250, 256, 300, 1000, 1024
You'd have to kill 48, 128, 256, 300 and 1024.
-hpa
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |