Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:35:12 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86_64 |
| |
* Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > you mean this single patch: > > > > modules-fold-percpu_modcopy-into-modulec-and-get-rid-of-the-macro-from-hell.patch > > > > that's the only patch i missed AFAICS. > > That is a pretty uncritical one. Then there is the fix of the zero > address handling in modules.c, the fixup for the use of __per_cpu_xx > variables in modules.c. etc.
you again talk about modules.c but my test kernel that crashes has no modules at all.
> It would be best to test against mm since there are core changes here > that will have to wait to the next merge period.
if you treat testing and review efforts like that they might have to wait even longer :-( "My stuff is there somewhere amongst 1415 -mm patches. Thank you for your interest and buzz off already."
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |