Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:17:01 -0600 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: named + capset = EPERM [Was: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2] |
| |
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com): > Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com): > > Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com): > > > > > > --- Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 11/28/2007 12:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm2/ > > > > [...] > > > > > +capabilities-introduce-per-process-capability-bounding-set.patch > > > > > > > > A regression against -mm1. This patch breaks bind (9.5.0-18.a7.fc8): > > > > capset(0x19980330, 0, > > > > > > > {CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH|CAP_SETGID|CAP_SETUID|CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE|CAP_SYS_CHROOT|CAP_SYS_RESOURCE, > > > > > > > CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH|CAP_SETGID|CAP_SETUID|CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE|CAP_SYS_CHROOT|CAP_SYS_RESOURCE, > > > > 0}) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) > > > > > > > > $ grep SEC .config > > > > CONFIG_SECCOMP=y > > > > # CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK is not set > > > > CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m > > > > # CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3 is not set > > > > # CONFIG_SECURITY is not set > > > > # CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES is not set > > > > > > > > probably this hunk?: > > > > @@ -133,6 +119,12 @@ int cap_capset_check (struct task_struct > > > > /* incapable of using this inheritable set */ > > > > return -EPERM; > > > > } > > > > + if (!!cap_issubset(*inheritable, > > > > + cap_combine(target->cap_inheritable, > > > > + current->cap_bset))) { > > > > + /* no new pI capabilities outside bounding set */ > > > > + return -EPERM; > > > > + } > > > > That shouldn't be it, since you can't lower cap_bset since > > CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=n. > > Hmm, but sure enough that appears to be it. > > Still trying to figure out why.
No. Seriously. You're kidding me.
Patch attached :(
Thanks for spotting this, Jiri. I don't know where I introduced this since I thought all my tests had passed...
thanks, -serge
From 70d5da610fdbd66a36886c01e27b7fb11d2de044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sergeh@us.ibm.com <hallyn@kernel.(none)> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:16:23 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] capabilities: correct logic at capset_check
Fix typo at capset_check introduced with capability bounding set patch.
Signed-off-by: sergeh@us.ibm.com <hallyn@kernel.(none)> --- security/commoncap.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c index c25ad09..503e958 100644 --- a/security/commoncap.c +++ b/security/commoncap.c @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int cap_capset_check (struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective, /* incapable of using this inheritable set */ return -EPERM; } - if (!!cap_issubset(*inheritable, + if (!cap_issubset(*inheritable, cap_combine(target->cap_inheritable, current->cap_bset))) { /* no new pI capabilities outside bounding set */ -- 1.5.1 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |