lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: enable dual rng on VIA C7
    Dave Jones wrote:
    > > > Something like this perhaps ?
    > >
    > > Yes, I think that's a big step in the right direction!
    > >
    > > But I am no expert and cannot really judge how necessary or correct the
    > > implementation is w.r.t. the 'undefined' function bits for CPU's that
    > > lack a certain feature.
    >
    > The checks at the end of the patch for the x86_mask/model ensure
    > we only enable the 2nd noise source on CPUs documented to have it,
    > so we should be safe.
    >
    > Andrew, want to throw that in the -mm pile for a while?

    Thanks for assuring we are 'safe'.
    Sounds OK to me.
    Thanks for picking up this tiny improvement.

    Any ideas on the power consumption increase question I received w.r.t.
    this patch? (or why VIA would have made the 2nd RNG switchable)
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-27 20:05    [W:0.033 / U:62.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site