Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:26:30 -0800 | | From | Dave Bailey <> | | Subject | Re: Problem with ufs nextstep in 2.6.18 (debian) |
| |
This fixes only symptom, not illness. This check represent what code think about filesystem layout. On what actually kind of UFS system did you test this patch? When I sometime ago fixed similar issue for openstep ufs, actully this was darwin's ufs which has the same layout, I just set s_dirblksize to right value, may be for UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_NEXTSTEP, UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_NEXTSTEP_CD you need do the same, see TODO items in fs/ufs/super.c.
-- /Evgeniy
Your right; I was using the NextStep ufstype on an OpenStep HD. I have now checked an old (pre NS 3.3) floppy and a NS 3.3 CDROM and they both need a s_dirblksize of 1024, just as the OpenStep filesystem does. For the floppies, one can just use the OpenStep option, but for a NextStep CDROM, the right s_dirblksize is crucial. I would suggest changing both.
Thanks for the response, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |