Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:03:24 +0000 | From | Alasdair G Kergon <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1: kcryptd vs lockdep |
| |
Also io->pending may need better protection - atomic, but missing memory barriers? (May be getting away without sometimes due to side-effects of other function calls, but needs doing properly.)
[BTW Other device-mapper atomic_t usage also needs reviewing.]
Alasdair -- agk@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |