[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:07:50PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> It may take multiple steps to identify a deadlock. With the above
> you'll miss deadlocks like
> process 1 is requesting a lock held by process 2
> process 2 is blocking on a lock held by process 3
> process 3 is blocking on a lock held by process 1.
> Could you give more details about how you're causing
> posix_locks_deadlock to hang? Is there a simple test-case you can post?

Sorry I missed your message due to procmail filters and failure to
read linux-kernel for a week. : )

A bit late now since you've appliead a workaround but FWIW the test
case was posted as a followup to my initial post.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-02 16:09    [W:0.196 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site