Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework | Date | Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:53:40 -0800 |
| |
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, David Brownell wrote: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119463810905330&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119463811005344&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119463811105352&w=2 > > Plus the appended tweak.
-ENOPATCH ... ;)
========== Minor fixups to the gpiolib code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> --- lib/gpiolib.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- g26.orig/lib/gpiolib.c 2007-11-12 15:06:45.000000000 -0800 +++ g26/lib/gpiolib.c 2007-11-12 15:07:36.000000000 -0800 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ #define extra_checks 0 #endif -/* gpio_lock protects the table of chips and to gpio_chip->requested. +/* gpio_lock protects the table of chips and gpio_chip->requested. * While any gpio is requested, its gpio_chip is not removable. It's * a raw spinlock to ensure safe access from hardirq contexts, and to * shrink bitbang overhead: per-bit preemption would be very wrong. @@ -533,6 +533,6 @@ static int __init gpiolib_debugfs_init(v NULL, NULL, &gpiolib_operations); return 0; } -postcore_initcall(gpiolib_debugfs_init); +subsys_initcall(gpiolib_debugfs_init); #endif /* DEBUG_FS */ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |