[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 01/28] cpu alloc: The allocator
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, David Miller wrote:
>> One thing you could do is simply use a vmalloc allocation in the
>> non-virtualized case.
> Yuck. Meaning to add more crappy code. The bss limitations to 8M is a bit
> strange though. Do other platforms have the same issues?

Maybe not so crappy, because even for i386 code, you might use not a strict
vmalloc() implementation but at least reserving percpu space inside the
vmalloc range. (ie not use a dedicated area as your current patchset does)

This is because NR_CPUS is defaulted to 32 on i386 (with a limit of 256), so
reserving 256*256KB = 64 MB of virtual space might be too much. (this is half
the typical vmalloc area)

The idea would be :

- Reserving an area of NR_CPUS*256KB inside vmalloc() space (but of course not
allocating pages)

- Then for each non possible cpu, 'release' its 256KB area and give it back to
vmalloc free areas pool.

Once you add in mm/vmalloc.c all needed helpers, no need to use BSS Megablob
anymore ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-13 23:09    [W:0.336 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site