Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:00:30 +0100 (CET) | From | Christian Kujau <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| |
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > I think that we're fairly good about working the regressions in > Adrian/Michal/Rafael's lists but once Linus releases 2.6.x we tend to let > the unsolved ones slide, and we don't pay as much attention to the > regressions which 2.6.x testers report.
Can't we wait until all regressions[0] are fixed before releasing a new 2.6.x? I'd consider regressions a *literal* show stopper, and with this policy they just have be fixed, nothing would "slide"...
my 2 cents, Christian.
[0] preferably only reproducible regressions, with responsive reporters. -- BOFH excuse #380:
Operators killed when huge stack of backup tapes fell over. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |