lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] x86: fix taking DNA during 64bit sigreturn
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> The *real* fix for this is almost certainly to just get rid of the 64-bit
>> code entirely, and use the 32-bit code as the base for one single unified
>> setup.
>
> That would likely break the ABI. x86-64 ABI is completely different here --
> no ibcs, just pure x86 ISA.
>

Different ABIs clearly have to be handled, but I don't think that is a
huge deal. The i387 code overall (not just asm/i387.h) is very
different, though, and I find it unlikely that a properly unified code
is going to be ready and working in the 2.6.24 timeframe. I'm exploring
if a partial merge with high confidence level is feasible; either way, a
proper merge for 2.6.25 is probably the right thing.

-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-13 01:17    [W:0.101 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site