lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:

> A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses
> libnuma. Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which
> has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting
> optional flags.
>

I think what would end up happening is that additional functions would be
added to libnuma that would effect the system-wide nodemask numbering by
simply OR'ing the MPOL_F_MODE_SYS_WIDE flag as part of the mode actual.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-01 20:09    [W:1.725 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site