Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:06:00 -0700 (PDT) | From | David Rientjes <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice |
| |
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:
> A library such as libnuma can set them, yes, but not everyone uses > libnuma. Basically everyone uses the standard C library, glibc, which > has the system call wrappers, but these wrappers should not be setting > optional flags. >
I think what would end up happening is that additional functions would be added to libnuma that would effect the system-wide nodemask numbering by simply OR'ing the MPOL_F_MODE_SYS_WIDE flag as part of the mode actual.
David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |