Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:27:57 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight |
| |
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:11:53AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > But for those that run test suites, they should be smart enough to put > > in more documentation into the change log to state how it was tested. > > I disagree. The SCM changelog should contain _what_ a patch does and if > necessary _why_ it does so. The _why_ part is more important than _what_. The diff should hopefully explain the _what_ part.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |