lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes
    Andrew wrote:
    > I'm getting 100% rejects from this - probably whatever patch it is
    > patching got lost or unrecognisably mangled.

    Yup - so far as I can tell, you didn't pick up the base patch that
    this current patch fixes. So, no, I wouldn't expect this patch to
    make any sense.

    As I stated in this current patch in the diffstat section after the
    '---' marker, this current patch applies to the base patch of Subject:

    [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag

    You probably didn't pick up that base patch because Nick and I are
    still haggling over it. Well ... we've agreed, but I can't get the
    scheduler to work as I thought Nick wanted, and I'm still waiting
    to hear from Nick again.

    ==> So yeah - throw this current patch out.

    Nick ... you there ?

    --
    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-06 01:41    [W:0.021 / U:3.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site