Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:02:17 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: -rt scheduling: wakeup bug? |
| |
* Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > if (rq->curr && p && rq && _need_resched()) > > trace_special_pid(p->pid, PRIO(p), PRIO(rq->curr)); > > Not an issue with the patch, just that last bit of code pulled in for > context. I don't think it is a bug, but the checking of 'rq' after > checking 'rq->curr' just doesn't look right (or necessary). Could it > just be an artifact from earlier versions of the code?
yeah, you are right - and rq shouldnt ever be NULL there anyway.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |