lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [NFS] What's slated for inclusion in 2.6.24-rc1 from the NFS client git tree...
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 11:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:43:04 +0200
    > Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote:
    >
    > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:00:50 -0400
    > > Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
    > >
    > > > On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 08:52 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
    > > > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:41:16 -0400
    > > > > Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > > > We also have the 64-bit inode support from RedHat/Peter Staubach.
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > As has been pointed[1] out[2], this will cause regressions for
    > > > > non-LFS applications (of which there are still lots and lots). This
    > > > > change should be in feature-removal (the "feature" being removed is
    > > > > legacy support for non-LFS applications using NFS servers that make
    > > > > full use of the protocol) and preferably accompanied with
    > > > > appropriate user space changes (e.g. compatibility option in glibc).
    > > > >
    > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241348
    > > > > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=118701088726477&w=2
    > > > >
    > > > > Rgds
    > > >
    > > > How about a boot/module parameter to turn it on or off?
    > > >
    > >
    > > That would be perfect. It can even be in non-legacy mode by default,
    > > just as long as you can go back to the old behaviour when/if you run
    > > into a non-LFS application.
    > >
    >
    > Wouldn't a mount option be better?

    I suppose that might be OK if you know that the 32-bit legacy
    applications will only touch one or two servers, but that sounds like a
    niche thing.

    On the downside, forcing all those people who have portable 64-bit aware
    applications to upgrade their version of mount just in order to have
    stat64() work correctly seems unnecessarily complicated. I'd prefer not
    to have to do that unless someone comes up with a good reason why we
    must.

    Cheers
    Trond

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-04 21:19    [W:0.024 / U:1.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site