Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | swhiteho@redhat ... | Subject | [PATCH 09/51] [GFS2] use an temp variable to reduce a spin_unlock | Date | Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:49:02 +0100 |
| |
From: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
this is more clear.
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c index fba1f1d..1f7b038 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c @@ -346,15 +346,16 @@ static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *file, const char __user *u, size_t count, static unsigned int dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) { + unsigned int mask = 0; + poll_wait(file, &send_wq, wait); spin_lock(&ops_lock); - if (!list_empty(&send_list)) { - spin_unlock(&ops_lock); - return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM; - } + if (!list_empty(&send_list)) + mask = POLLIN | POLLRDNORM; spin_unlock(&ops_lock); - return 0; + + return mask; } static const struct file_operations dev_fops = { -- 1.5.1.2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |