[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/33] Swap over NFS -v14
On 10/31/07, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:50 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:37:53PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > Don't be misled. Swapping over NFS is just a scarecrow for the
> > > seemingly real impetus behind these changes which is network storage
> > > stuff like iSCSI.
> >
> > So can we please do swap over network storage only first? All these
> > VM bits look conceptually sane to me, while the changes to the swap
> > code to support nfs are real crackpipe material.
> Yeah, I know how you stand on that. I just wanted to post all this
> before going off into the woods reworking it all.
> > So please get the VM bits for swap over network blockdevices in first,
> Trouble with that part is that we don't have any sane network block
> devices atm, NBD is utter crap, and iSCSI is too complex to be called
> sane.
> Maybe Evgeniy's Distributed storage thingy would work, will have a look
> at that.

Andrew recently asked Evgeniy if his DST was ready for merging; to
which Evgeniy basically said yes:

It would be great if DST could be merged; whereby addressing the fact
that NBD is lacking for net-vm. If DST were scrutinized in the
context of net-vm it should help it get the review that is needed for

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-31 15:57    [W:0.061 / U:7.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site