lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
On 10/25/2007 9:41 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
>> Do other people want to stand up and be "LSM maintainers" in the sense
>> that they also end up being informed members who can also stand up for new
>> modules and help merge them, rather than just push the existing one(s)?
>> Chris? Casey? Crispin?
>
> Stephen and James, despite their clear bias towards SELinux, do try to
> give good feedback. But you are right, there's not enough active help
> for people trying to make a contribution to get their code in shape.
> Many of the modules that come along have been misguided conceptually,
> but I think that e.g. apparmor, tomoyo, smack could use that kind
> of constructive help to get into final mergable shape. Personally,
> I haven't spent nearly enough time reviewing those, my apologies to
> those developers. So, yes, help is welcome.

Yes, TOMOYO Linux is committed to help.
I mean, please count me in.

PS
Chris, I've been waiting for your comments for our code. :)

Regards,
Toshiharu Harada

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-30 04:39    [W:0.129 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site