lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.23 boot failures on x86-64.
    Date
    On Monday 29 October 2007 20:43:11 Dave Jones wrote:
    > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:03:09PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    >
    > > > > It's probably the usual "nobody tests sparsemem at all" issue.
    > > >
    > > > We've been using SPARSEMEM in Fedora for a *long* time.
    > > > So long in fact, I forget why we moved away from DISCONTIGMEM, so there's
    > > > a significant number of users using that configuration for some time.
    > >
    > > Supposedly you wanted a slower kernel that needs more memory?
    > >
    > > Ok I wasn't aware of that. I tended to get sparsemem reports usually
    > > at least 1-2 releases after the fact, so it looked like it was undertested.
    >
    > Looking at cvs history, I can't figure out what the reasoning was,
    > but every Fedora (and RHEL5) kernel since 2006/07/05 has been that way.
    >
    > Curious how no-one noticed either of the side-effects you mention.

    It's a few percent on a few benchmarks iirc. vmemmap (now in .24) was supposed
    to address that.

    -Andi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-29 20:59    [W:0.040 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site