Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:29:12 +0000 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) |
| |
Hi!
> > > The idea that poor security is worse than no security is fallacious, > > > and not backed up by common experience. > > > > There is a ton of evidence both in computing and outside of it which > > shows that poor security can be very much worse than no security at all. > > (So, I take it that you *don't* lock your bike up, as poor security is > worse than none?)
I do lock my bike with combination lock I found somewhere and cracked in five minutes... sometimes.
But do you suggest that I use paper tape to 'lock' my bike to streetlight? You just said that poor security is better than none, right?
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |