[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
    On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:

    > > > Now, if we could replace the 'cpuset_mems_allowed' nodemask with a
    > > > pointer to something stable, it might be a win.
    > >
    > > The memory policies are already shared and have refcounters for that
    > > purpose.
    > I must have missed that in the code I'm reading :)

    What is the benefit of having pointers to nodemasks? We likely would need
    to have refcounts in those nodemasks too? So we duplicate a lot of
    the characteristics of memory policies?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-26 23:41    [W:0.018 / U:2.964 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site