[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, David Rientjes wrote:

> You would pass NODE_MASK_ALL if your intent was to interleave over
> everything you have access to, yes. Otherwise you can pass whatever you
> want access to and your interleaved nodemask becomes
> mpol_rebind_policy()'s newmask formal (the cpuset's new mems_allowed)
> AND'd with pol->passed_nodemask.

We would need two fields in the policy structure

1. The specified nodemask (generally ignored)

2. The effective nodemask (specified & cpuset_mems_allowed)

If we have these two then its easy to get a bit further by making
the first nodemask a relative nodemask. The calculation of the effective
nodemask changes somewhat but the logic is then applicable to MPOL_BIND as

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-26 23:15    [W:0.089 / U:6.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site