lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview
    On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:37:21AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:40:24 -0700
    > jjohansen@suse.de wrote:
    >
    > before going into the LSM / security side of things, I'd like to get
    > the VFS guys to look at your VFS interaction code.
    >
    yes, the vfs interaction definitely need their review.

    > In addition, I'd like to ask you to put a file in Documentation/
    > somewhere that describes what AppArmor is intended security protection
    > is (it's different from SELinux for sure for example); by having such a
    > document for each LSM user, end users and distros can make a more
    > informed decision which module suits their requirements... and it also
    > makes it possible to look at the implementation to see if it has gaps
    > to the intent, without getting into a pissing contest about which
    > security model is better; but unless the security goals are explicitly
    > described that's a trap that will keep coming back... so please spend
    > some time on getting a good description going here..
    >
    yes this is needed and a good idea in general

    thanks
    john
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-26 20:37    [W:4.955 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site