[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Is gcc thread-unsafe?
    Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > Ismail Dönmez wrote:
    >> Thursday 25 October 2007 Tarihinde 17:55:00 yazmıştı:
    >>> I think the OpenBSD people decided to actually do something about this,
    >>> and I suspect it had *nothing* to do with license issues, and everything
    >>> to do with these kinds of problems. I wish them all the luck, although
    >>> personally I think LLVM is a much more interesting project.
    >> And on the LLVM side all hopes for clang [0] at least for better C++
    >> error reporting ;-)
    >> [0]
    > Someone should take 'sparse' and use that as a C language front-end to
    > LLVM...

    Among clang's "features":
    "A single unified parser for C/ObjC/C++"

    bleh. I cannot imagine how ugly a C parser gets, after being taught
    C++. IMO since you can basically redefine everything in C++, it's not a
    language but a proto-language.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-26 01:07    [W:0.021 / U:14.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site