lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000.
    On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:03:38 -0700
    "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:

    > Dave Jones wrote:
    > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > >
    > > > > In any case, this patch should not be merged. We often send it around to users to
    > > > > debug their issue in case it involves eeproms, but merging it will just conceal
    > > > > the real issue and all of a sudden a flood of people stop reporting *real* issues
    > > > > to us.
    > > >
    > > > Sorry, I disagree. Just as with e100, if there is a clear way the user
    > > > can recover their setup -- and Adam says his was effective -- I don't
    > > > see why we should be denying users the ability to use their own hardware.
    > >
    > > Indeed. This is a common enough problem that not including it causes more pain
    > > than its worth. I have two affected boxes myself that I actually thought
    > > the hardware was dead before I tried ajax's patch.
    >
    >
    > look: You should have reported this to us and you didn't. Now you are using the
    > fact that you did not report it as an argument which is out of place.
    >
    > why do you say it is common? how often have you seen this and not reported it back
    > to our support? are you willingly trying to frustrate this issue?
    >
    >
    > Auke

    What about a compromise like "ignore_checksum" module option?
    That way users with bad checksums wouldn't just ignore the problem (no one reads console logs),
    but would have a way to correct the checksum.

    There are many reasons would want the ability to fix the problem themselves without
    asking Intel.

    --
    Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-24 01:57    [W:0.023 / U:29.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site