lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:24:02 +0200 Henrik Carlqvist wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:47:38 -0400
> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:17:00 +0200, Sam Ravnborg said:
> > > I assume
> > > depends on MODULES
> > >
> > > should do the trick.
> >
> > Umm... I think that will work backwards, and give you CONFIG_FOO=y
> > if.f the kernel *supports* modules. What he needs is to be able to say
> > CONFIG_FOO=n or CONFIG_FOO=m, but *ban* CONFIG_FOO=y.
>
> Yes, thats right, MODULES does not ban y as would be needed. As an example

Agreed.

> I tried to do a quick test, I edited drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/Kconfig to look
> like this:
>
> -8<-------------------------------------------------------
> config SCSI_QLA_FC
> tristate "QLogic QLA2XXX Fibre Channel Support"
> depends on PCI && SCSI && MODULES
> select SCSI_FC_ATTRS
> select FW_LOADER
> ---help---
> This qla2xxx driver supports all QLogic Fibre Channel
> PCI and PCIe host adapters.
>
> By default, firmware for the ISP parts will be loaded
> via the Firmware Loader interface.
>
> ISP Firmware Filename
> ---------- -----------------
> 21xx ql2100_fw.bin
> 22xx ql2200_fw.bin
> 2300, 2312, 6312 ql2300_fw.bin
> 2322, 6322 ql2322_fw.bin
> 24xx ql2400_fw.bin
>
> Upon request, the driver caches the firmware image until
> the driver is unloaded.
>
> Firmware images can be retrieved from:
>
> ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware/
> -8<-------------------------------------------------------
>
> The only thing that I did change was that I added "&& MODULES" to the
> depends line. However, this only causes the driver to be possible to build
> when you build a kernel with module support. Still tristate allows you to
> build it both as a module and as a driver built into the kernel. However,
> when built into the kernel the driver is unusable as it needs its firmware
> which it can't reach.
>
> Is there any other way to specify that a functionality can only be built
> as a module, not built into the kernel?

config FOO
depends on BAR && m

restricts FOO to module-only.

> In my firsta attempts to post about these tests my post ended up not on
> the mailing list but as a reply to Sam Ravnborg only, apologies for
> that...

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-21 18:47    [W:0.097 / U:1.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site