lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: yield API
    From
    Date

    On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 08:46 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    [...]

    > APIs that are not in any real, meaningful use, despite a decade of
    > presence are not really interesting to me personally. (especially in
    > this case where we know exactly _why_ the API is used so rarely.) Sure
    > we'll continue to support it in the best possible way, with the usual
    > kernel maintainance policy: without hurting other, more commonly used
    > APIs. That was the principle we followed in previous schedulers too. And
    > if anyone has a patch to make sched_yield() better than it is today, i'm
    > of course interested in it.

    Do you still have intentions to add a directed yield API? I remember
    seeing it in the earlier CFS patches.


    - Eric


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-03 00:41    [W:0.022 / U:0.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site