Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:21:30 +0200 | From | "Kay Sievers" <> | Subject | Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24) |
| |
On 10/2/07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 12:31 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > What would be the point in another top-level tree for device > > information? All devices you are exporting information for, are > > already in the sysfs tree, right? > > Never did find NFS mounts/servers/superblocks or whatever constitutes a > BDI for NFS in there. Same goes for all other networked filesystems for > that matter.
How about adding this information to the tree then, instead of creating a new top-level hack, just because something that you think you need doesn't exist.
You called sysfs a mess, seems you work on that topic too. :)
Kay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |