lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
On 10/2/07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 12:31 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> > What would be the point in another top-level tree for device
> > information? All devices you are exporting information for, are
> > already in the sysfs tree, right?
>
> Never did find NFS mounts/servers/superblocks or whatever constitutes a
> BDI for NFS in there. Same goes for all other networked filesystems for
> that matter.

How about adding this information to the tree then, instead of
creating a new top-level hack, just because something that you think
you need doesn't exist.

You called sysfs a mess, seems you work on that topic too. :)

Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-02 13:23    [W:0.149 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site