lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [NFS] Kernel Oops in NFS
From
Date

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 16:01 -0500, Jason.V.Mock@L-3Com.com wrote:
> > We've come across an Oops, in what appears to NFS.
> >
> > 2.6.22.6 vanilla + realtime-lsm
> > RHEL4 over PXE/NFS_ROOT
> >
> >
> > Oct 9 14:26:13 WS15 gdm(pam_unix)[6038]: session opened for
> > user mockj by (uid=0) Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 gconfd
> > (mockj-7583): starting (version 2.8.1), pid
> > 7583 user 'mockj'
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel
> > NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 Oct 9
> > 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: printing eip:
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: c01a9fb8
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: *pde = c691d067 Oct 9 14:26:48
> > WS15 kernel: Oops: 0000 [#1] Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel:
> > PREEMPT SMP Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: Modules linked in:
> > lm85 w83781d hwmon_vid hwmon ipv6 parport_pc lp parport
> > autofs4 tulip dm_mirror dm_mod button battery ac mct_u232
> > usbserial uhci_hcd ehci_hcd nvidia(P) e7xxx_edac edac_mc
> > rng_core i2c_i801 i2c_core aic79xx scsi_transport_spi
> > ata_piix libata scsi_mod snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus
> > snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_page_alloc
> > snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq
> > snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore realtime commoncap
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: CPU: 0
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c01a9fb8>] Tainted: P
> > VLI
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: EFLAGS: 00210246 (2.6.22-6.0.WSsmp #1)
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: EIP is at nfs_lookup+0x11b/0x26a
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: c0367600 ecx:
> > 00000000 edx: 00000000
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: esi: 00000000 edi: 00000000 ebp:
> > 00000000 esp: f63b5d44
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033
> > ss: 0068
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: Process gconfd-2 (pid: 7583,
> > ti=f63b4000 task=f6273070 task.ti=f63b4000) Oct 9 14:26:48
> > WS15 kernel: Stack: f63b5d60 f63b5d98 f63b5d9c 7fffffff
> > f63b5ed8 f63ef118 f63f5e8c f63b0002
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: f63db21c 00000000
> > c014843e 00000000
> > 0000000e 00000001 00000001 000081c0
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: 00000002 00001459
> > 000000c9 00000271
> > 00000000 00002000 00000008 00000000
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: Call Trace:
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c014843e>]
> > write_cache_pages+0x235/0x285 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel:
> > [<c01b4332>] nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xe5 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15
> > kernel: [<c01488c5>] mapping_tagged+0x2b/0x32 Oct 9
> > 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c016e227>] d_alloc+0x15e/0x166 Oct
> > 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c0166663>]
> > lookup_one_len+0xc5/0xe0 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel:
> > [<c01aabba>] nfs_sillyrename+0x12b/0x253 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15
> > kernel: [<c01aba09>] nfs_permission+0x0/0x147 Oct 9
> > 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c01aae6e>] nfs_unlink+0x81/0xfc Oct
> > 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c01667f4>] may_delete+0x55/0x10a
> > Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c0167a82>]
> > vfs_unlink+0xa1/0xc5 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel:
> > [<c0167b3b>] do_unlinkat+0x95/0xf5 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15
> > kernel: [<c0105a67>] do_syscall_trace+0x15c/0x19d Oct 9
> > 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c0103136>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Oct
> > 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: [<c0350000>]
> > cache_make_upcall+0x40/0x129 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel:
> > ======================= Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: Code: 24
> > 14 8b 00 83 c2 20 8b 58 38 8d 44
> > 24 1c 89 04 24 8b 44 24 18 ff 53 20 83 f8 fe 0f 84 93 00 00
> > 00 85 c0 89
> > c5 0f 88 3d 01 00 00 <8b> 76 04 8b 54 24 18 89 74 24 10 8b 82
> > a4 00 00 00 8b 54 24 64 Oct 9 14:26:48 WS15 kernel: EIP:
> > [<c01a9fb8>] nfs_lookup+0x11b/0x26a SS:ESP 0068:f63b5d4
> >
> > We haven't seen any negative side-effects other than users
> > seeing this in Kwrited quite often. We've yet to update to
> > 2.6.22.9, however we've examined the change logs and patches
> > associated with NFS between then and now, and don't see
> > anything appropriate for the errors we're receiving. Let me
> > know if you need anything else for this...
>
> I was just checking to see if there's anything that I'm missing here, in
> regards to never hearing a single thing back about this.
>
> - Jason Mock

Well... Your Oops did have the 'tainted' flag set, but in this case I
believe that the issue is already known. Please try

http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.22/linux-2.6.22-010-fix_nfs_reval_fsid.dif

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-19 01:25    [W:1.301 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site