lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: halt does not shut the system down
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:

> John Sigler wrote:
>
>> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>
>>> John Sigler wrote:
>>>
>>>> +===================================+
>>>> | Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
>>>> |-----------------------------------|
>>>> | Instant-Off ..... [v] |
>>>> | Delay 4 Sec. ..... [ ] |
>>>> | |
>>>> |-----------------------------------|
>>>> | ^V:Move ENTER:Accept ESC:Abort |
>>>> +===================================+
>>>>
>>>> 'Instant-Off' is the appropriate setting, right?
>>>
>>> Actually, default should be 4 sec delay. OS should have a chance to
>>> shut down the system...
>>
>> I don't see why this setting would have an impact on the outcome
>> of the 'halt' and 'poweroff' commands.
>>
> Well, it is not possible to tell, what BIOS writer have connected to this flag...

(It sucks to be stuck with a closed proprietary BIOS.)

I tested the other setting, and it didn't change anything.
The system remains powered on after executing poweroff.

Len: the system is 100% Intel (Intel CPU, Intel north bridge, Intel
south bridge, Intel integrated network controllers). Have Intel
engineers run into the same problem on a similar platform?

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148

Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-17 12:01    [W:0.545 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site