Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:59:13 +0200 | From | John Sigler <> | Subject | Re: halt does not shut the system down |
| |
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> John Sigler wrote: > >> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: >> >>> John Sigler wrote: >>> >>>> +===================================+ >>>> | Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN | >>>> |-----------------------------------| >>>> | Instant-Off ..... [v] | >>>> | Delay 4 Sec. ..... [ ] | >>>> | | >>>> |-----------------------------------| >>>> | ^V:Move ENTER:Accept ESC:Abort | >>>> +===================================+ >>>> >>>> 'Instant-Off' is the appropriate setting, right? >>> >>> Actually, default should be 4 sec delay. OS should have a chance to >>> shut down the system... >> >> I don't see why this setting would have an impact on the outcome >> of the 'halt' and 'poweroff' commands. >> > Well, it is not possible to tell, what BIOS writer have connected to this flag...
(It sucks to be stuck with a closed proprietary BIOS.)
I tested the other setting, and it didn't change anything. The system remains powered on after executing poweroff.
Len: the system is 100% Intel (Intel CPU, Intel north bridge, Intel south bridge, Intel integrated network controllers). Have Intel engineers run into the same problem on a similar platform?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Regards. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |