Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:13:56 -0700 (PDT) | From | Casey Schaufler <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities |
| |
--- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org): > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:41:59 -0500 > > "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > To properly test this the libcap code will need to be updated first, > > > which I'm looking at now... > > > > This seems fairly significant. I asusme that this patch won't break > > presently-deployed libcap? > > It will break libcap. And I'm not sure of the right way to address it. > So I was hoping to hear some ideas from Andrew Morgan, Chris Wright, and > Kaigai. > > We can introduce new capget64() and capset64() calls, and have > capget() return -EINVAL or -EAGAIN if a high bit would be needed to > accurately get the task's capabilities. > > Or we can require a new libcap, since capget and capset aren't > required for most day-to-day function anyway. > > I guess now that I've written this out, it seems pretty clear > that capget64() and capget64() are the way to go. Any objections?
Not from me. Thank you.
Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |